Hospitalización en paciente con cólico renal: Caracterización clínico-epidemiológica en el Hospital Clínico Herminda Martín, período marzo 2014 - marzo 2019 / Hospitalization in a patient with renal colic: Clinical-epidemiological characterization at the Herminda Martín Clinical Hospital, period March 2014 - March 2019

INTRODUCCIÓN: El cólico renal es una condición médica común en los servicios de urgencia. Representa la manifestación clínica más frecuente de urolitiasis, cuya patogenia es multifactorial, con tasas de prevalencia varía de 1% a 20% y una recurrencia a 10 años del 42% al 50%. OBJETIVO: Establecer el perfil clínico-epidemiológico, como también el diagnóstico y manejo de los pacientes hospitalizados por cólico renal en el Hospital Clínico Herminda Martín (HCHCM). MATERIAL Y MÉTODO: Estudio descriptivo retrospectivo en pacientes hospitalizados con diagnóstico de cólico renal en el HCHM de Chillán en el período marzo 2014-marzo 2019. Se estudiaron las variables: sexo, edad, presentación clínica de ingreso, factores de riesgo asociados, motivo de hospitalización, resultados imagenológicos y manejo clínico. Resultados. El 52,45% correspondió a pacientes de sexo masculino, encontrándose la mayor cantidad de pacientes en el intervalo de 40-49 años. La obesidad, antecedente de urolitiasis e hipertensión arterial fueron las patologías asociadas más frecuentes. En la mayoría de los pacientes, el motivo de la hospitalización fue la refractariedad al tratamiento analgésico, alcanzando un 86,76%. El 56,37% de los pacientes recibió manejo médico expulsivo y a un 19,11% de los pacientes se le realizó una intervención quirúrgica durante la hospitalización. CONCLUSIÓN: El perfil de éstos pacientes no sólo permite establecer medidas que podrían evitar un evento litiásico, sino que además se demuestra la necesidad de realizar un manejo óptimo que puede evitar reconsultas, sobrecarga de los servicios de urgencia, aumento de días cama y complicaciones.

INTRODUCTION: Renal colic is a common condition in the emergency department. It represents the most frequent clinical manifestation of urolithiasis, whose prevalence rate varies between 1% to 20%. Its pathogenesis is multifactorial, with a recurrence of 10 years from 42-50%. OBJECTIVE: Establish the clinical-epidemiological profile, as well as the diagnosis and management of patients hospitalized for renal colic at the Herminda Martín Clinical Hospital(HCHM). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective descriptive study of hospitalized patients diagnosed with renal colic at the HCHM, March 2014-March 2019, the variables were studied: sex, age, the clinical presentation of admission, associated risk factors, the reason for hospitalization, imaging results, and management. Results: 52.45% were male patients, with the highest number of patients in the range of 40-49 years. Obesity, a history of urolithiasis and hypertension, occurred more frequently within the associated pathologies. In most patients, refractable to analgesic treatment was the reason for hospitalization, reaching 86.76%. 56.37% of patients received expulsion medical management, and 19.11% of patientshad surgeryduring hospitalization. CONCLUSION: The profile of these patients not only allows them to establish measures that could prevent a lithiasis event but also shows the need for effective management of patients who can avoid reconsults, an overload of emergency services, increasedbed days and complications

High Temperatures and Kidney Disease Morbidity: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis / 예방의학회지

OBJECTIVES: In recent years, serious concerns have been raised regarding the impacts of rising temperatures on health. The present study was conducted to investigate the relationship between elevated temperatures and kidney disease through a systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS: In October 2017, 2 researchers independently searched related studies in PubMed and Embase. A meta-analysis was conducted using a random-effects model, including only studies that presented odds ratios, relative risks, or percentage changes, along with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The characteristics of each study were summarized, and the Egger test and funnel plots were used to evaluate publication bias. RESULTS: Eleven studies that met the criteria were included in the final analysis. The pooled results suggest an increase of 30% (95% CI, 20 to 40) in kidney disease morbidity with high temperatures. In a disease-specific subgroup analysis, statistically significant results were observed for both renal colic or kidney stones and other renal diseases. In a study design–specific subgroup analysis, statistically significant results were observed in both time-series analyses and studies with other designs. In a temperature measure–specific subgroup analysis, significant results were likewise found for both studies using mean temperature measurements and studies measuring heat waves or heat stress. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that morbidity due to kidney disease increases at high temperatures. We also found significant results in subgroup analyses. However, further time-series analyses are needed to obtain more generalizable evidence.

Low-dose intravenous ketamine versus intravenous ketorolac in pain control in patients with acute renal colic in an emergency setting: a double-blind randomized clinical trial / 대한통증학회지

BACKGROUND: This study was conducted to compare the effectiveness of low-dose ketamine versus ketorolac in pain control in patients with acute renal colic presenting to the emergency department (ED). METHODS: This is a double-blind randomized clinical trial. The initial pain severity was assessed using the numerical rating scale (NRS). Then, ketamine or ketorolac was administered intravenously at a dose of 0.6 mg/kg and 30 mg respectively. The pain severity and adverse drug reactions were recorded 5, 15, 30, 60, and 120 min thereafter. RESULTS: The data of 62 subjects in the ketamine group and 64 patients in the ketorolac group were analyzed. The mean age of the patients was 34.2 ± 9.9 and 37.9 ± 10.6 years in the ketamine and ketorolac group, respectively. There was no significant difference in the mean NRS scores at each time point, except for the 5 min, between the two groups. Despite a marked decrease in pain severity in the ketamine group from drug administration at the 5 min, a slight increase in pain was observed from the 5 min to the 15 min. The rate of adverse drug reactions, including dizziness (P = 0.001), agitation (P = 0.002), increased systolic blood pressure (> 140 mmHg), and diastolic blood pressure (> 90 mmHg) was higher in the ketamine group. CONCLUSIONS: Low dose ketamine is as effective as ketorolac in pain management in patients with renal colic presenting to the ED. However, it is associated with a higher rate of adverse drug reactions.

Low-Dose Unenhanced Computed Tomography with Iterative Reconstruction for Diagnosis of Ureter Stones

PURPOSE: To study the clinical application of low-dose unenhanced computed tomography with iterative reconstruction technique (LDCT-IR) on renal colic in the emergency department. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a prospective, single-blinded, randomized, and non-inferiority study. From March 2014 to August 2015, 112 patients with renal colic were included, and were randomized to either LDCT-IR (n=46) or standard-dose unenhanced CT (SDCT) (n=66) groups. The accuracy of urolithiasis diagnosis was the primary endpoint of this study. Radiation dose, size and location of the stone, hydronephrosis, other diseases except urolithiasis, and results of treatment were analyzed between the two groups. RESULTS: The average effective dose radiation of SDCT was approximately four times higher than that of LDCT-IR (6.52 mSv vs. 1.63 mSv, p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in the accuracy of ureteral stone diagnosis between the two groups (LDCT-IR group: 96.97% vs. SDCT group: 98.96%, p=0.392). No significant difference was observed regarding the size and location of a stone, hydronephrosis, and diagnosis of other diseases, except urolithiasis. False negative results were found in two LDCT-IR patients and in one SDCT patient. In these patients, stones were misread as vascular calcification, and were difficult to diagnose because evidence of hydronephrosis and ureteral dilatation was not found. CONCLUSION: LDCT-IR, as a first-line imaging test, was non-inferior to SDCT with respect to diagnosis of ureter stones, and was clinically available for the evaluation of renal colic.

Current practice of antibiotic utilization for renal colic in the emergency room

ABSTRACT Introduction Urinalysis (UA) in the emergency setting for patients with nephrolithiasis produces potentially confusing results leading to treatment of presumed urinary tract infections (UTIs). Our objective was to evaluate the use of antibiotics in patients with nephrolithiasis in a large network of emergency departments (EDs). Methods A retrospective analysis of all ED visits associated with an ICD-9 diagnosis of nephrolithiasis and a CT scan between 2010 and 2013 was performed. Urinalysis data, the use of IV and PO antibiotics during the ED visit and at discharge were assessed. The presence of fever, elevated serum WBCs, >5 WBCs per hpf, and/or dip positive nitrites were used as appropriate criteria for antibiotic use. Results Urinalysis data were available for 3,518 (70%) of 5,035 patients with an ED diagnosis of nephrolithiasis and CT imaging. Of these visits, 237 patients had positive nitrites (6.7%) and 864 had >5 WBCs per hpf (24.6%) with 158 (4.5%) having both findings for a total of 943 patients. Intravenous antibiotics were given to 244 patients (25.9%) and oral antibiotics were given to 629 patients (66.7 %) with positive UA findings. Of the 2,440 patients with a negative UA and no leukocytosis or fever, 86 patients (3.5%) received IV antibiotics and 533 patients (21.8%) received PO antibiotics upon discharge. Conclusions Proper treatment of nephrolithiasis in the ED includes the screening and diagnosis of concomitant UTIs. However, correct interpretation of UA studies is vital to the correct implementation of antibiotic therapy. This study suggests that 1/3 of patients were undertreated and 21.8% were over-treated.

Factors affecting the urologist’s decision to administer ureteral stone therapy: a retrospective cohort study

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to evaluate the factors influencing treatment option selection among urologists for patients with ureteral stones, according to the stone diameter and location. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the records of 360 consecutive patients who, between January 2009 and June 2014, presented to the emergency department with renal colic and were eventually diagnosed with urinary stones via computed tomography. The maximal horizontal and longitudinal diameter and location of the stones were investigated. We compared parameters between patients who received urological intervention (group 1) and those who received medical treatment (group 2). RESULTS: Among the 360 patients, 179 (49.7%) had stones in the upper ureter and 181 (50.3%) had stones in the lower ureter. Urologic intervention was frequently performed in cases of upper ureteral stones (P<0.001). In groups 1 and 2, the stone horizontal diameters were 5.5 mm (4.8 to 6.8 mm) and 4.0 mm (3.0 to 4.6 mm), stone longitudinal diameters were 7.5 mm (6.0 to 9.5 mm) and 4.4 mm (3.0 to 5.5 mm), and ureter diameters were 6.4 mm (5.0 to 8.0 mm) and 4.7 mm (4.0 to 5.3 mm), respectively (P<0.001). The cut-off values for the horizontal and longitudinal stone diameters in the upper ureter were 4.45 and 6.25 mm, respectively (sensitivity 81.3%, specificity 91.4%); those of the lower ureter were 4.75 and 5.25 mm, respectively (sensitivity 79.4%, specificity 79.4%). CONCLUSION: The probability of a urologic intervention was higher for patients with upper ureteral stones and those with stone diameters exceeding 5 mm horizontally and 6 mm longitudinally.

Restricción del ductus arterioso fetal en gestante del tercer trimestre por consumo de paracetamol / Fetal ductus arteriosus constriction in the final third of pregnancy due to paracetamol comsumption

El ductus arterioso es una derivación que conecta la arteria pulmonar con el arco aórtico el que permite la descarga del ventrículo derecho sin pasar por la alta resistencia de los pulmones. La permeabilidad del conducto arterioso se mantiene durante la gestación por las prostaglandinas producidas especialmente PGE2, que circulan a nivel local, especialmente PGE2, y la baja saturación de oxígeno fetal. Se trata de una paciente que desde la semana 20 de gestación es diagnosticada de cólico renal con la necesidad de varios ingresos y colocación de catéter doble J por parte de Urología y la cual recibió tratamiento con paracetamol intravenoso y oral. Los controles ecográficos obstétricos a los largo de la gestación fueron normales hasta que en semana 32, cuando ingresa de nuevo por cuadro sospechoso de cólico renal tratado con Paracetamol, se objetivan en ecografía hallazgos compatibles con restricción precoz del ductus arterioso. Se indicó suspender el paracetamol y los cambios se redujeron en las 48 horas posteriores y casi desaparecieron por completo una semana tras la retirada de la medicación. La gestación llegó a término y el recién nacido presentó un ecocardiograma postnatal normal. Recomendamos la restricción de los analgésicos no opiáceos en el tercer trimestre y el seguimiento con Doppler del conducto arterioso en los casos en que se requiriera usarlos(AU)

Ductus arteriosus is a derivation that connects the pulmonary artery with the aortic arch and allows the discharge from the right ventricle without passing the high resistance of lungs. Permeability of the ductus arteriosus is kept during gestation because of the production of prostaglandins, particularly PGE2, which circulates locally, and the low fetal oxygen saturation. Here is a pregnant woman who, since her 20th week of gestation was diagnosed as a renal colic case. She required several admissions to hospital and placement of double J stent in the urology service and she was treated with intravenous and oral paracetamol. Obstetric ultrasound scans throughout gestation were normal until week 32, when she was admitted to hospital again for suspected renal colic and treated again with paracetamol. At that moment, findings compatible with early ductus arteriosus constriction were observed in ultrasound. It was then decided to stop the paracetamol treatment, the changes declined in the following 48 hours and they almost disappeared completely after one week after the medication withdrawal. It was finally a term pregnancy and the postnatal echocardiogram of the newborn was normal. Restricting non-opioid analgesics in the third pregnancy trimester and the follow up of the ductus arteriosus with Doppler technique when required(AU)

Ureteral Stent Insertion in the Management of Renal Colic during Pregnancy / 전남의대학술지

To determine an optimal invasive intervention for renal colic patients during pregnancy after conservative treatments have been found to be unhelpful. Among the available invasive interventions, we investigated the reliability of a ureteral stent insertion, which is considered the least invasive intervention during pregnancy. Between June 2006 and February 2015, a total of 826 pregnant patients came to the emergency room or urology outpatient department, and 39 of these patients had renal colic. The mean patient age was 30.49 years. In this retrospective cohort study, the charts of the patients were reviewed to collect data that included age, symptoms, the lateralities and locations of urolithiasis, trimester, pain following treatment and pregnancy complications. Based on ultrasonography diagnoses, 13 patients had urolithiasis, and 13 patients had hydronephrosis without definite echogenicity of the ureteral calculi. Conservative treatments were successful in 25 patients. Among these treatments, antibiotics were used in 15 patients, and the remaining patients received only hydration and analgesics without antibiotics. Several urological interventions were required in 14 patients. The most common intervention was ureteral stent insertion, which was performed in 13 patients to treat hydronephrosis or urolithiasis. The patients' pain was relieved following these interventions. Only one patient received percutaneous nephrostomy due to pyonephrosis. No pregnancy complications were noted. Ureteral stent insertion is regarded as a reliable and stable first-line urological intervention for pregnant patients with renal colic following conservative treatments. Ureteral stent insertion has been found to be equally effective and safe as percutaneous nephrostomy, which is associated with complications that include bleeding and dislocation, and the inconvenience of using external drainage system.

Does the use of bedside ultrasonography reduce emergency department length of stay for patients with renal colic?: a pilot study

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of adding bedside ultrasonography to the diagnostic algorithm for nephrolithiasis on emergency department (ED) length of stay. METHODS: A prospective, randomized, controlled pilot study was conducted from October 2014 to December 2014 with patients with acute flank pain. In the non-ultrasonography group (NUSG), non-contrast computed tomography was selected based on clinical features and hematuria in the urinalysis. In the ultrasonography group (USG), non-contrast computed tomography was selected based on clinical features and hydronephrosis on bedside ultrasonography. The primary outcome was ED length of stay. The secondary outcomes were radiation exposure, amount of analgesics, proportion of patients with diseases other than ureteral calculus, and proportion of patients with unexpected ED revisits within 7 days from the index visit. RESULTS: A total of 103 patients were enrolled (NUSG, 51; USG, 52). The ED length of stay for the USG (89.0 minutes) was significantly shorter than that for the NUSG (163.0 minutes, P<0.001). There were no significant differences between the two groups in the radiation exposure dose (5.29 and 5.08 mSv, respectively; P=0.392), amount of analgesics (P=0.341), proportion of patients with diseases other than ureteral calculus (13.0% and 6.8%, respectively; P=0.486), and proportion of patients with unexpected ED revisits within 7 days from the index visit (7.8% and 9.6%, respectively; P=1.000). CONCLUSION: The use of early bedside ultrasonography for patients with acute flank pain could reduce the ED length of stay without increasing unexpected ED revisits.

Ureteral Stent Insertion in the Management of Renal Colic during Pregnancy / 전남의대학술지

To determine an optimal invasive intervention for renal colic patients during pregnancy after conservative treatments have been found to be unhelpful. Among the available invasive interventions, we investigated the reliability of a ureteral stent insertion, which is considered the least invasive intervention during pregnancy. Between June 2006 and February 2015, a total of 826 pregnant patients came to the emergency room or urology outpatient department, and 39 of these patients had renal colic. The mean patient age was 30.49 years. In this retrospective cohort study, the charts of the patients were reviewed to collect data that included age, symptoms, the lateralities and locations of urolithiasis, trimester, pain following treatment and pregnancy complications. Based on ultrasonography diagnoses, 13 patients had urolithiasis, and 13 patients had hydronephrosis without definite echogenicity of the ureteral calculi. Conservative treatments were successful in 25 patients. Among these treatments, antibiotics were used in 15 patients, and the remaining patients received only hydration and analgesics without antibiotics. Several urological interventions were required in 14 patients. The most common intervention was ureteral stent insertion, which was performed in 13 patients to treat hydronephrosis or urolithiasis. The patients' pain was relieved following these interventions. Only one patient received percutaneous nephrostomy due to pyonephrosis. No pregnancy complications were noted. Ureteral stent insertion is regarded as a reliable and stable first-line urological intervention for pregnant patients with renal colic following conservative treatments. Ureteral stent insertion has been found to be equally effective and safe as percutaneous nephrostomy, which is associated with complications that include bleeding and dislocation, and the inconvenience of using external drainage system.

Evaluation of oxidative stress tests in patients diagnosed with renal colic in the emergency department of Ankara Ataturk training and research hospital, Turkey

To investigated oxidative stress changes in renal colic patients, and to determine its role in differential diagnosis of renal colic. The cross-sectional study was conducted at Ankara Atatürk Training and Research Hospital, Turkey, from June 2012 to December 2012 and comprised patients with complaints suggesting of renal colic and diagnosed with urinary stone. Healthy individuals were enrolled to form the control group. The patients and the control group were evaluated in terms of oxidative stress parameters. SPSS 17 was used for statistical analysis. Of the 83 subjects, 50[60%] were patients with renal colic, while 33[40%] were healthy controls. Among the patients, 25[50%] were men and 25[50%] were women. Among the controls, there were 17[51.5%] men and 16[48.5%] women. No statistically significant difference was found between the two groups in terms of age and gender [p>0.05]. Likewise, no statistically significant difference was found between the oxidative stress indexes of the two groups [p>0.05]. There was no significant increase in oxidative stress in patients with renal colic. The result may help in the differential diagnosis of patients with abdominal pain

Is it possible to objectify the visual pain scale?

Objectives: To test our hypothesis that a new modified VAS [mVAS] is superior and more objective than VAS in evaluating pain perception and treatment response between genders who have renal colic pain

Methods: The individuals in patient and control groups were first asked to mark the pain perceived during access of IV line [VAS[IV] score]. Then the patients with renal colic were asked to mark the pain they experienced before treatment [VAS[RC] score] and at 15 and 30 minutes after the administration of the first analgesic drug. The modified VAS scores [mVAS score] were obtained by subtracting the VASIV score from VAS[RC] score

Results: When VAS was used, the female patients had significantly higher level of pain at 0, 15, and 30th minutes than men [p = 0.012, p = 0.001, and p = 0.003, respectively]. However, there was not any significant difference at 0 and 30[th] min between sexes while female patients had significantly higher level of pain scores only at 15[th] minute according to mVAS scores [p = 0.027]

Conclusion: We think that the mVAS is superior and more objective than VAS in evaluating pain perception and abolished the difference in the perceived level of pain due to gender

Distribution of ureteral stones and factors affecting their location and expulsion in patients with renal colic

PURPOSE: To evaluate the distribution of ureteral stones and to determine their characteristics and expulsion rate based on their location. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed computed tomography (CT) findings of 246 patients who visited our Emergency Department (ED) for renal colic caused by unilateral ureteral stones between January 2013 and April 2014. Histograms were constructed to plot the distribution of stones based on initial CT findings. Data from 144 of the 246 patients who underwent medical expulsive therapy (MET) for 2 weeks were analyzed to evaluate the factors responsible for the stone distribution and expulsion. RESULTS: The upper ureter and ureterovesical junction (UVJ) were 2 peak locations at which stones initially lodged. Stones lodged at the upper ureter and ureteropelvic junction (group A) had a larger longitudinal diameter (4.21 mm vs. 3.56 mm, p=0.004) compared to those lodged at the lower ureter and UVJ (group B). The expulsion rate was 75.6% and 94.9% in groups A and B, respectively. There was no significant difference in the time interval from initiation of renal colic to arrival at the ED between groups A and B (p=0.422). Stone diameter was a significant predictor of MET failure (odds ratio [OR], 1.795; p=0.005) but the initial stone location was not (OR, 0.299; p=0.082). CONCLUSIONS: The upper ureter and UVJ are 2 peak sites at which stones lodge. For stone size 10 mm or less, initial stone lodge site is not a significant predictor of MET failure in patients who have no previous history of active stone treatment in the ureter.

Value of color doppler ultrasound, kub and urinalysis in diagnosis of renal colic due to ureteral stones

Purpose Despite the routine use of helical CT in diagnosis of renal colic, there are recent concerns regarding the radiation exposure, overuse and costs. We attempted in this retrospective study to evaluate the accuracy of ultrasound (gray-scale and color Doppler with twinkling), KUB and urinalysis in diagnosis of renal colic due to ureteral calculi presented in Emergency Room. Materials and Methods A total of 939 consecutive cases of renal colic presented to ER have been managed and evaluated by ureteral ultrasound, KUB and urinalysis for the presence of ureteral stones. Non-confirmatory cases were subjected to Helical CT examination. Results Renal and ureteral ultrasound (gray-scale) alone detected ureteral calculi in 615 cases (65.4%) and after utilizing Color Doppler Ultrasound with twinkling the diagnosis was made with confidence in 935 cases (99.6%) but 4 (0.4%). KUB showed radiopaque stones in 503 (53.6%) patients and no stones were detected in 436 (46.4%). Microhematuria presented in 835 (88.9%) cases while absent in 102 (10.9%). There were 190 (20.3%), 77 (8.2%) and 671 (71.5%) patients with upper, middle and lower ureteral stones respectively. The simultaneous positive findings in US and KUB with microhematuria were found only in 453 (48.2%) cases. Conclusions The use of Color Doppler ultrasound with twinkling increased the detection rate of ureteral stones in acute renal colic patients presented to ER with less radiation exposure. Ultrasound examination as a single modality is superior to KUB and urinalysis in initial diagnosis of renal colic. .

Raised white cell count in renal colic: is there a role for antibiotics?

To determine the use of antibiotics in patients with renal colic and an elevated white cell count [WCC] in the absence of other features of infection. A retrospective audit of patients presenting to an emergency department with renal colic caused by a solitary ureteric stone over a 6 month period. Student's t-test. Fifty patients met the inclusion criteria for this study. In 42 patients [84%] the urinalysis showed hematuria only and all urine culture results were negative for microbial growth. The mean WCC was 11.5 × 10 [9] [4-22.1] and was raised in 34 patients [80.9%]. The mean neutrophil count was 8.75 × 10[9]/L [2.3-18.6] and C-reactive protein [CRP] 15.9 [1-192]. Antibiotics were commenced in 34 patients [80.9%] based solely on the raised WCC. In eight patients [16%] there were leucocytes and/or nitrites on urinalysis and all urine cultures were positive for growth [coliforms in five, streptococcus in two and candida in one specimen]. The mean WCC was 10.5 × 10[9]/L [7.7-16.5] and was raised in four patients. The mean neutrophil count was 8.4 × 10[9]/L [4.9-15.2] and CRP 40.79 [3-86]. One patient had pyrexia. All eight patients were commenced on antibiotics based on the WCC and/or urinalysis result. Over three-quarters of the patients [80.9%] in this study who presented with renal colic were unjustifiably commenced on antibiotics based solely on an elevated WCC. Antibiotic use in renal colic should be reserved for when there are features of sepsis or the urinalysis is positive. Further work is required to determine the significance of the observed results and the threshold for starting antibiotics

Enfrentamiento del cólico renal en urgencia / Confrontation of renal colic in urgency

Ureteral colic as a nosologic entity, is part of a select group of pathologies that present themselves in an intense and acute form, in which the patient suffers excruciating pain and demands quick diagnosis and treatment. It’s also a common disease in our emergency service, like in other countries. The aim of the present study is to standardize and deepen the management and treatment of ureteral colic, from the perspective of the emergency medicine...

Diagnostic Characteristics of Geriatric Patients With Ureterolithiasis in Emergency Center

BACKGROUND: Incidence rate of ureterolithiasis has been increasing worldwide in general, with an especially rapid increase in the elderly, over 65 years of age. Therefore, the characteristics of geriatric patients diagnosed with uureterolithiasis in an Emergency Center were examined. METHODS: A total of 613 consecutive patients who were diagnosed with ureterolithiasis through computed tomography from January 2012 to March 2014 were analyzed retrospectively. The patients were divided in two groups: the geriatric group and nongeriatric group. RESULTS: Among the 613 patients, there were 64 geriatric patients (> or =65 years, 10.4%) and 549 nongeriatric patients (<65 years, 89.6%). In the geriatric patients, 13 patients (20.3%) appeared without any pain or with atypical types of pain, while 39 of the nongeriatric patients (7.1%) had no pain or atypical symptoms, presenting a statistically significant difference (p<0.001). Gastrointestinal symptoms such as nausea and vomiting were more common in geriatric patients than in nongeriatric patients (42.2% vs. 29.9%, p=0.044), while lower positive rate of microscopic hematuria was reported (78.1% vs. 90.5%, p=0.002). Furthermore, in geriatric patients, the positive rate of costovertebral angle tenderness was lower and distal ureter stones were found to be more common, while urine pH and serum creatinine levels were higher. CONCLUSION: In comparison to nongeriatric patients, geriatric patients with ureterolithiasis showed lower rates of renal colic and hematuria, while showing higher rates of having gastrointestinal symptoms such as nausea and vomiting. Thus, differences between these two groups should be considered in evaluating geriatric patients to prevent complications which may be caused from the late diagnosis of ureterolithiasis.